- YA
No description provided.
- LU
While less code, this is almost certainly slower. Function lookups/executions aren’t free. Will perf test when have some spare time
- LU
Confirmed. On Node 18.12.1, these are the Array-related benchmark results:
``` # Arrays clsx x 10,514,890 ops/sec ±0.14% (101 runs sampled) clsx (apply) x 9,399,861 ops/sec ±0.18% (99 runs sampled)
# Nested Arrays clsx x 8,326,852 ops/sec ±0.39% (98 runs sampled) clsx (apply) x 6,989,572 ops/sec ±0.14% (99 runs sampled)
# Nested Arrays w/ Objects clsx x 8,458,578 ops/sec ±0.17% (97 runs sampled) clsx (apply) x 7,853,655 ops/sec ±0.17% (100 runs sampled)
# Mixed clsx x 9,369,221 ops/sec ±0.29% (100 runs sampled) clsx (apply) x 8,903,049 ops/sec ±0.13% (100 runs sampled)
# Mixed (Bad Data) clsx x 3,654,474 ops/sec ±0.42% (97 runs sampled) clsx (apply) x 3,554,495 ops/sec ±0.33% (100 runs sampled) ```
The `clsx (apply)` – which is this PR – is slower in every suite
Thank you for the PR though! Was a good idea :D